Factors associated with time to presentation to Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Australia, after STI contact notification
K. Hall
A E * , H. Lu A , A. Wong A B , A. McNulty A C and C. Bourne A B D
A
B
C
D
E
Abstract
Despite partner notification (PN) being an essential component of sexually transmitted infection (STI) control programs, little is known about how contacts of STIs are notified, and the time taken to present for testing. We aimed to evaluate both aspects in people presenting to Sydney Sexual Health Centre who reported being a sexual contact of someone diagnosed with an STI.
We conducted a retrospective observational study of data collected between 1 April 2020 and 31 March 2021 at Sydney Sexual Health Centre. A pop-up field in the electronic medical record collected data about people’s experience of being notified of their sexual contact with an STI. We ran univariable and multivariable analysis of time to presentation and PN method against clinical and demographic information.
There were 2182 presentations because of STI contact notification. Median time to presentation was 3 days (IQR 1–7 days), which did not differ by spoken or electronic PN. In the multivariable model, people who received spoken PN were less likely to present in <3 days compared with contacts who received electronic PN, (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65–0.93, P = 0.007). This indicates electronic PN may prompt faster testing for STIs. Higher partner number was associated with receiving electronic PN.
Our study suggests that electronic PN may prompt faster testing for STIs. It provides valuable insights into the characteristics of STI contacts, who are rarely the focus of PN research. Understanding what motivates notified contacts to seek care is integral in modernising PN practices, as rates of STIs climb.
Keywords: chlamydia, contact tracing, gonorrhoea, mycoplasma, partner notification, sexual health, STI testing, syphilis.
References
1 Ward H, Bell G. Partner notification. Medicine 2014; 42(6): 314-7.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Pellowski J, Mathews C, Kalichman MO, Dewing S, Lurie MN, Kalichman SC. Advancing partner notification through electronic communication technology: a review of acceptability and utilization research. J Health Commun 2016; 21(6): 629-37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Schleihauf E, Leonard E, Phillips C, Hatchette T, Haldane D, Arnason T, et al. Increase in gonorrhea incidence associated with enhanced partner notification strategy. Sex Trans Dis 2019; 46(11): 706-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
4 ASHM. Contact tracing. Patient delivered partner therapy (PDPT). Available at https://contacttracing.ashm.org.au/patient-delivered-partner-therapy/ [cited 25 February 2025]
5 Kao S-YZ, Enns EA. Follow the sex: influence of network structure on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of partner management strategies for sexually transmitted infection control. Sex Trans Dis 2020; 47(2): 71-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
6 The State of Queensland. Sexual health. Contact tracing. The State of Queensland. Available at https://www.qld.gov.au/health/staying-healthy/sexual-health/contact-tracing [cited 12 August 2024]
7 Contesse MG, Fredericksen RJ, Wohlfeiler D, Hecht J, Kachur R, Strona FV, et al. Acceptability of using geosocial networking applications for HIV/sexually transmitted disease partner notification and sexual health services. Sex Transm Dis 2020; 47(1): 41-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Pennise M, Inscho R, Herpin K, Owens J, Jr, Bedard BA, Weimer AC, et al. Using smartphone apps in STD interviews to find sexual partners. Public Health Rep 2015; 130(3): 245-52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
9 NICE Evidence Reviews Collection. Partner notification methods to prevent or reduce STIs: Reducing sexually transmitted infections (STIs): evidence review E. NICE Guideline, No. 221. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2022. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589853/ [cited 25 October 2023]
10 Althaus CL, Turner KM, Mercer CH, Auguste P, Roberts TE, Bell G, et al. Clinical effectiveness of partner notification. In: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of traditional and new partner notification technologies for curable sexually transmitted infections: observational study, systematic reviews and mathematical modelling. NIHR Journals Library; 2014. pp. 13–19. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK261439/ [cited 11 February 2025]
11 Ferreira A, Young T, Mathews C, Zunza M, Low N. Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2013. Available at https://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD002843.pub2 [cited 20 August 2023]
12 Kachur R, Hall W, Coor A, Kinsey J, Collins D, Strona FV. The use of technology for sexually transmitted disease partner services in the united states: a structured review. Sex Transm Dis 2018; 45(11): 707-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Sawras V, Deuffic-Burban S, Préau M, Spire B, Yazdanpanah Y, Champenois K. Assessing complex interventions: a systematic review of outcomes used in randomised controlled trials on STI partner notification in high-income countries. BMC Public Health 2023; 23(1): 1838.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Data @ Kirby Institute. Detailed sexually transmissible infections dashboards. Available at https://www.data.kirby.unsw.edu.au/sexually-transmissible-infections [cited 26 August 2024]
15 NSW Health. COVID-19 update; 2020. Available at https://www.health.nsw.gov.au:443/news/Pages/20200318_01.aspx [cited 20 February 2025]
16 NSW Health. COVID-19 (Coronavirus). Public health orders and restrictions. Available at https://www.health.nsw.gov.au:443/Infectious/covid-19/Pages/public-health-orders.aspx [cited 2023 November 10]
17 NSW Health. New COVID-19 restrictions for greater Sydney. Available at https://www.health.nsw.gov.au:443/news/Pages/20210623_01.aspx [cited 14 February 2025]
18 Rasul R, McIver R, Patel P, Foster R, McNulty A. Non-empirical management of asymptomatic chlamydia and gonorrhoea reduces unnecessary antibiotic use fivefold: a before and after study. Sex Transm Infect 2023; 99(1): 30-4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Turner KME, Round J, Horner P, Macleod J, Goldenberg S, Deol A, et al. An early evaluation of clinical and economic costs and benefits of implementing point of care NAAT tests for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea in genitourinary medicine clinics in England. Sex Transm Infect 2014; 90(2): 104-11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
20 Whitlock GG, Gibbons DC, Longford N, Harvey MJ, McOwan A, Adams EJ. Rapid testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections improve patient care and yield public health benefits. Int J STD AIDS 2018; 29(5): 474-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
21 Woodward C, Bloch S, McInnes-Dean A, Lloyd KC, McLeod J, Saunders J, et al. Digital interventions for STI and HIV partner notification: a scoping review. Sex Transm Infect 2024; 100(4): 242-50.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
22 Brown LB, Miller WC, Kamanga G, Nyirenda N, Mmodzi P, Pettifor A, et al. HIV partner notification is effective and feasible in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities for HIV treatment and prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 56(5): 437-42.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
23 Schwebke JR, Desmond RA. A randomized controlled trial of partner notification methods for prevention of trichomoniasis in women. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37(6): 392-96.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Iyer S, Zionts DL, Psaros C, Tyagi A, Jarolimova J, Platt L, et al. Electronic partner notification for sexually transmitted infections: a qualitative assessment of patient, clinical staff, and state field epidemiologist perspectives. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2024; 38(2): 82-92.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
25 Kocur W, McLeod J, Bloch SCM, MacDonald JJ, Woodward C, McInnes-Dean A, et al. Improving digital partner notification for sexually transmitted infections and HIV through a systematic review and application of the behaviour change wheel approach. Sex Health 2024; 21: SH23168 Available at https://www.publish.csiro.au/sh/SH23168.
| Google Scholar |
26 Ooi C, Lewis DA, Newman CE. Engaging hard-to-reach men-who-have-sex-with-men with sexual health screening: qualitative interviews in an Australian sex-on-premises-venue and sexual health service. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2022; 54(3): 116-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Tomnay JE, Bourke L, Fairley CK. Exploring the acceptability of online sexually transmissible infection testing for rural young people in Victoria. Aust J Rural Health 2014; 22(1): 40-4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
